I spoke at ACCU 2025 this year. It took place in Bristol, but was hybrid, so I also gave an online poster presentation.
The schedule is here: https://accuconference.org/2025/schedule. The opening keynote was given by Anastasia Kazakova about The Next Coding Horizon: Proactive LLMs for Enhanced Productivity. She shared some stats about what tools etc programmers are using and told us some Jetbrains tools related to LLMs. Anastasia kept telling us to wait for more details at Daisy's keynote talk on Thursday.
I went to Heaps Don't Lie - Guidelines for Memory Allocation in C++ by Mathieu Ropert next, which talked through malloc being slow and some alternatives, which ended up being worryingly close to writing your own malloc! Meanwhile, Dom Davies filled a slot in the room next door, because the intended speaker couldn't make it. He played some music which almost drowned out Mathieu, who handled this very well.
 |
| Mathieu pointing out allocations in code |
I took some time out after lunch to use the gym at the hotel, so missed the next slot. After that I went to A Very Small Language Model by Jez Higgins. He explained Markov chains: what happens next depends on the current state, not how you got to the current state. He used these to build a text generator, in JavaScript, using n-grams, starting with 2, and then increasing. This means using the last two words to predict the next word, based on a corpus (or document, like the Complete Works of Sherlock Holmes or Jane Austin). You tokenise the text (break into words), and build a lookup table of what follows 2-grams (or 3-grams etc). That gives you a probability of the next word, so you can probabilistically select what to generate next. Many silly sentences were generated.
 |
| Jez explaining predictive text |
There were 10 lightning talks that evening. A speaker gets up to five minutes, and is kicked off stage if they go on for too long. You had to be there (but they may be online at some point).
 |
| First session of lightning talks |
 |
| Khalil starting his keynote |
After an in-depth start, I went to C++ Coroutines - Gods from the Machine by Phil Nash. I did attend a workshop he ran, taking a similar approach at CppOnSea a couple of years ago. He starts by adding co_return to a function and follows the compiler error messages from there to get a working coroutine. If you need help writing a coroutine, listen to his talks when it's online.
There was a poster session, and a student, Jacob Farrow, from Bradford University had his poster proposal accepted. His poster title was "Tracking Success: Enhancing Visual Tracking Skills in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment through Interactive Digital Tools". I attempted to join, but couldn't find a quiet spot with enough WiFi coverage, so couldn't listen in. A shame. (I'm an industrial advisor at the Uni, so I shared the call of proposals with some CompSci lecturers, who persuaded the student to join in.) By this point, my brain had overloaded, so I skipped a session and went for a walk.
In the afternoon I went to
How old am I in Seconds and other insights from the C++ chrono library by Nicolai M. Josuttis. He gave a great introduction to using
std::chrono for time and durations in C++. He didn't really answer the questions posed in the title - he lied about his date of birth, allegedly, and pointed out the different
leap seconds used by different clocks. Howard Hinnant has a blog about leap seconds:
https://howardhinnant.github.io/date/d0355r4.html, if you can't wait for Nico's recording on YouTube. (The blog covers much more than leap seconds.)
 |
| Nico counting in seconds |
There were more lightning talks that evening, followed by a pub quiz (which I didn't attend because I needed some tea). I shared my poster and pointed out to attendees the conference was hybrid, so some people were online.
 |
| More lightning talks (including me) |
Thursday began with a
KEYNOTE: Learning to stop writing code (and why you won't miss it) by Daisy Hollman. She told us about
Claude and
Anthropic. Many people know ChatGPT, but not Claude. They are both LLMs, generating various types of output. Daisy explained how they work, and told us some inside information (
Think harder). She put an emphasis on
agents: at a high level, using several smaller parts rather than one big framework. What I found interesting was trying to wire in json or similar so the "AI" can use tools too. This might generate better code. Watch this space.
 |
| Daisy talking about agents |
I went to
/ Error Handling Omitted / by Roger Orr next. I was speaking afterwards, so my mind wasn't 100% focused. And Dom was in the room next door, and his microphone was coming out through the speakers in this room to begin with! However, Roger did suggest you at least hint at error handling in docs or code examples. He explored various ways to report errors, and maybe he'll write it up for Overload one day. (Or 'll look at my notes and add more details here, later).
I attended some of the ACCU's AGM over lunch, but had to leave early to set up for my talk afterwards. My talk was called
An introduction to reinforcement learning: Snake your way out of a paper bag. I used a simple type of reinforcement learning, called Q-learning, and demonstrated an agent (that word again), moving in space. I gradually got it to play a game of Snake. Reinforcement learning doesn't use labelled data. Instead, agents trying actions, and either get a reward or penalty. They can then probabilistically pick an action next time. They look as though they are learning, but this begs a question about what learning really means.
After my talk, Steve Love talked about C#:
Puzzling C#. He's written a book for PragProg:
https://pragprog.com/titles/csharpbt/c-brain-teasers/, which will be in paper form soon. His talk went through a few puzzles from the book in depth, and introduced some new puzzles. I know some C#, but have lost track recently, so this was a good way to get a glimpse of newer features and things to watch out for.
 |
| Steve ready to give his talk |
There was a speakers' dinner on Thursday evening, so the final day started with slightly later sessions, leaving the keynote to the end. I had a late breakfast, so I missed the first sessions. I did make it to
How to write a Rubik's cube solver by Sam Saariste. He used Python for his code. He's been working on this with his son, who has entered speed cubing competitions and is doing very well at these. I had to leave before he finished, but his talking made me think, both about how to represent a Rubik's cube and how to enumerate moves. His visualisations were lovely.
 |
| Sam's cube image, which he could rotate to demo playing. The numbers are a way to represent the cube which his son helped invent. |
I had to leave early to be in my poster session. I sat in the backstage area, hoping the WiFi would work better, which it did. I shared some details about my
Learn C++ by Example book, listing the table of contents and ways to try to (re)learn C++ over the various new standards. I believe writing small programs that do something, for example games, are a great way to learn. Only one person turned up, but we had a long chat about writing books about tech stuff that keeps changing. A challenge :-)
I managed to grab some lunch, then went to
The Past, Present and Future of Programming Languages by Kevlin Henney. He listed various languages according to various indices, like TIOBE. As usual, he covered a huge range of topics, and sneaked in a few jokes. He also reminded us of history - for example why we have paradigms in programming. This dates back to a paper, "The paradigms of programming" by
Robert W. Floyd from
Communications of the ACM, Volume 22, Issue 8, Published: 01 August 1979, available here:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/359138.359140. There were lots of other lessons from history, and a musing on what might come next. The main thing I remember is that nothing much has changed for a while, in terms of new languages.
 |
| One of Kevlin's slides: The past, present and future walk into a bar. It was a tense situation. |
Finally, we had the closing
KEYNOTE: Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks: A Tale of Two Emulators by Matt Godbolt. He showed us two emulators for the ZX Spectrum he had written. One implemented the way he usually approaches emulators, and the second trying to use modern C++, including templates, coroutines and modules. It's really encouraging to see a person of renown being honest about things they find confusing or that didn't work. He had various slides of old games which some people managed to guess when asked. It was a great talk, with some neat tricks. (I'll dust off my notes and list some later).
 |
| Matt summing up |
His summary reminded us
- Learning is uncomfortable
- Challenge your assumptions
- Do things that bring you joy
- Testing is always worth it
I had a great conference, met new people, caught up with others I already knew and was very tired by the end. We got a new kitten about 6 weeks beforehand, so we weren't sure how she would react when we got home. She was pleased to see us, and demonstrated this by playing lots.
 |
| Willow showing off how to play "put a toy in a box" |
